liquidex/treehouse
liquidex/treehouse
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 39 Activity

fix tree

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
liquidex 2023-10-20 15:53:04 +02:00
parent 3f257abeb4
commit a986b6426c
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
content/programming/projects/muscript.tree
View file

@ -189,6 +189,7 @@
- real case: getting the superclasses of `Hat_Player` takes a really long time because it's _big_ - real case: getting the superclasses of `Hat_Player` takes a really long time because it's _big_
(`Hat_Player.uc` itself is around 8000 lines of code, and it has many superclasses which are also pretty big) (`Hat_Player.uc` itself is around 8000 lines of code, and it has many superclasses which are also pretty big)
% id = "01HD6NRBEZ8FMFMHW0TF62VBEC"
+ ### ideas I tried out + ### ideas I tried out
% id = "01HAS9RREBVAXX28EX3TGWTCSW" % id = "01HAS9RREBVAXX28EX3TGWTCSW"
@ -225,18 +226,23 @@
% id = "01HAS9RREBWZKAZGFKH3BXE409" % id = "01HAS9RREBWZKAZGFKH3BXE409"
- one place where the current approach of the lexer eagerly emitting diagnostics fails is the case of `<ToolTip=3D location>`, where `3D` is parsed as a number literal with an invalid suffix and thus errors out - one place where the current approach of the lexer eagerly emitting diagnostics fails is the case of `<ToolTip=3D location>`, where `3D` is parsed as a number literal with an invalid suffix and thus errors out
% id = "01HD6NRBEZ2TCHKY1C4JK2EK0N"
- implementing this taught me one important lesson: context switching is expensive - implementing this taught me one important lesson: context switching is expensive
% id = "01HD6NRBEZCKP5ZYZ3XQ9PVJTD"
- having the lexer as a separate pass made the parsing 2x faster, speeding up the - having the lexer as a separate pass made the parsing 2x faster, speeding up the
compiler pretty much two-fold (because that's where the compiler was spending most of its time) compiler pretty much two-fold (because that's where the compiler was spending most of its time)
% id = "01HD6NRBEZP6V4J1MS84C6KN1P"
- my suspicion as to why this was slow is that the code for parsing, preprocessing, - my suspicion as to why this was slow is that the code for parsing, preprocessing,
and reading tokens was scattered across memory - also with lots of branches that and reading tokens was scattered across memory - also with lots of branches that
needed to be checked for each token requested by the parser needed to be checked for each token requested by the parser
% id = "01HD6NRBEZDM4QSN38TZJCXRAA"
+ I think also having token data in one contiguous block of memory also helped, though + I think also having token data in one contiguous block of memory also helped, though
isn't as efficient as it could be _yet_. isn't as efficient as it could be _yet_.
% id = "01HD6NRBEZWSA9HFNPKQPRHQK1"
- the current data structure as of writing this is - the current data structure as of writing this is
```rust ```rust
struct Token { struct Token {
@ -251,6 +257,7 @@
(with some irrelevant things omitted - things like source files are not relevant (with some irrelevant things omitted - things like source files are not relevant
for token streams themselves) for token streams themselves)
% id = "01HD6NRBEZXCE5TQSMQHQ29D90"
- I don't know if I'll ever optimize this to be even more efficient than it - I don't know if I'll ever optimize this to be even more efficient than it
already is, but source ranges are mostly irrelevant to the high level task of already is, but source ranges are mostly irrelevant to the high level task of
matching tokens, so maybe arranging the storage like matching tokens, so maybe arranging the storage like
@ -262,6 +269,7 @@
``` ```
could help could help
% id = "01HD6NRBEZ90Z3GJ8GBFGN0KFC"
- another thing that could help is changing the `usize` source ranges to - another thing that could help is changing the `usize` source ranges to
`u32`, but I don't love the idea because it'll make it even harder to `u32`, but I don't love the idea because it'll make it even harder to
support large files - not that we necessarily _will_ ever support them, support large files - not that we necessarily _will_ ever support them,