liquidex/treehouse
liquidex/treehouse
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 39 Activity

yeah

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
liquidex 2023-09-12 14:38:56 +02:00
parent 8cad6600ed
commit b089d14906
1 changed files with 10 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
content/programming/projects/stitchkit.tree
View file

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
% id = "01HA0GPJ8B0BZCTCDFZMDAW4W4"
% id = "01HA4P1KVBKC1YAV3MNGCEK2SG"
- [repo][def:stitchkit/repo]
% id = "01HA4KNTTKQ3XXPMQ4BYEK7ASD"
@ -53,19 +53,19 @@
- also see [MuScript's insanium][branch:01HA4KNTTGG3YX2GYFQ89M2V6Q]
% id = "01HA4KNTTKF0EGFMG2229Z9XKB"
- hot reloading scripts in the editor
+ hot reloading scripts in the editor
% id = "01HA4KNTTK5VS9BR12H3M5CFXE"
- in theory if we control the editor process, we should be able to search the address space for various anchor points
% id = "01HA4NZ9DAWBD2KQW8YB8Z7WPZ"
- scripts can be up to 65536 bytes long - this might not seem like much, but bytecode is much more compact than text!
+ scripts can be up to 65536 bytes long - this might not seem like much, but bytecode is much more compact than text!
% id = "01HA4NZ9DARFC10P5AFT6J03E1"
- from my analyses when building [Yarnbox][branch:programing/projects/yarnbox], most chunks of bytecode don't exceed 4096 bytes
% id = "01HA4KNTTKW393XV8CPZSW2J7H"
- the engine loads your bytecode *mostly* verbatim, so we could include a recognizable signature at the end of every script
+ the engine loads your bytecode *mostly* verbatim, so we could include a recognizable signature at the end of every script
% id = "01HA4NZ9DADP5E842D1630NH19"
- I imagine we could use a short string of bytes that's unlikely to collide with anything yet fast to search for. probably 16 bytes (128 bits) would be enough but we can experiment
@ -83,6 +83,12 @@
% id = "01HA4NZ9DA9YKXHM4FDT5T1KBT"
- and the typical mod doesn't have that many functions (what, 200 maybe? that would be ~12.5 MiB of memory, which ain't much)
- with the bytecode of the script found in memory, we can modify it arbitrarily however we want
- except it's not that simple because scripts contain object references, and we have no way to resolve those to addresses
- we could use `DynamicLoadObject` though, as cursed as that is :thinking:
% id = "01HA4NZ9DAJWYBEZV2P1PYA4DW"
- the downside of this is that we could only modify the bytecode of functions.