figures & figcaptions for docs
could probably work in trees but eh
This commit is contained in:
parent
944a56800e
commit
ce04cbdc92
2 changed files with 68 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -133,10 +133,23 @@ It was a fight to the death over who can win the most friends online in a room a
|
|||
It was a matter of creating the best multiplayer painting app, and swaying our whole community over to it.
|
||||
|
||||
{.wide}
|
||||
:::: figure
|
||||
|
||||
![MultiPixel running in the browser. There's a toolbar listing a bunch of tools on the left, including brushes, a flood fill, an airbrush, and smears. Next to that is a brush settings window, with a colour palette, and sliders for Size, Flow, and Smoothing. On the canvas there's a couple scribbles, including an at "@" and a tilde "~".][pic:01K3XBA43PZMKRC6VGJE0DYSB5]
|
||||
|
||||
{.overlay-bottom-right}
|
||||
::: figcaption
|
||||
|
||||
This is what MultiPixel looks like today.
|
||||
|
||||
It's got plenty of drawing tools.
|
||||
|
||||
:::
|
||||
|
||||
::::
|
||||
|
||||
Ultimately, I think MultiPixel won the battle.
|
||||
It had a browser version, a flood fill tool, and undo/redo, and that was enough to make the drawing experience _miles_ better than what NetCanv could ever hope to offer.
|
||||
It had a browser version, a flood fill tool, and an undo feature, and that was enough to make the drawing experience _miles_ better than what NetCanv could ever hope to offer.
|
||||
|
||||
The one thing NetCanv was better at was performance, being a native app written in OpenGL, with client-side, GPU-powered rendering of brushes.
|
||||
But raw performance is never nearly enough to win people over.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue