Improve SEO #45

New issue

Open

opened 2024-11-12 23:53:51 +01:00 by riki · 1 comment

riki commented

2024-11-12 23:53:51 +01:00

Owner

Currently we can observe Google indexing certain parts of the treehouse that are not very relevant:

/h
/b
/treehouse/new, probably?

Individual pages are also missing dates (perhaps something to be sourced from Git?) though those seem to work for /b.

Also, they're indexing the back porch, which is bad.

Currently we can observe Google indexing certain parts of the treehouse that are not very relevant: - `/h` - `/b` - `/treehouse/new`, probably? Individual pages are also missing dates (perhaps something to be sourced from Git?) though those seem to work for `/b`. Also, they're indexing the back porch, which is bad.

riki added the

feat

label 2024-11-24 14:26:52 +01:00

riki commented

2024-11-28 22:02:46 +01:00

Author

Owner

Devised a more sensible plan:

/b pages are marked as noindex
all pages have <link rel=canonical>
certain subdirectories of /static are allowed to be index to prevent soft 404s

Devised a more sensible plan: - `/b` pages are marked as `noindex` - all pages have `<link rel=canonical>` - certain subdirectories of `/static` are allowed to be index to prevent soft 404s